<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The height of Hubris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cynicalbastard.com/index.php/2007/03/the-height-of-hubris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cynicalbastard.com/index.php/2007/03/the-height-of-hubris/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:39:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertie</title>
		<link>http://www.cynicalbastard.com/index.php/2007/03/the-height-of-hubris/comment-page-1/#comment-7243</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicalbastard.com/index.php/2007/03/the-height-of-hubris/#comment-7243</guid>
		<description>Seeing only two sides to every story is needlessly simplistic surely?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing only two sides to every story is needlessly simplistic surely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King Cogidubnus</title>
		<link>http://www.cynicalbastard.com/index.php/2007/03/the-height-of-hubris/comment-page-1/#comment-7225</link>
		<dc:creator>King Cogidubnus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicalbastard.com/index.php/2007/03/the-height-of-hubris/#comment-7225</guid>
		<description>Two sides to every story.....

Letters
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dawkins: an apology to Peter Kay

Saturday March 10, 2007

Guardian

I am distressed to find myself reported as participating in a &quot;literary spat&quot;, and as &quot;pouring scorn&quot; on an individual, comedian Peter Kay, for whom I actually feel nothing but goodwill (Heard the one about the atheist who scorned a comedian for his belief in a comforting God? March 8). The explanation is as follows. I am one of those whom reporters regularly telephone for a soundbite. Last week, I was fed a quotation from somebody, previously unknown to me, who said he believed in God because he found it comforting. Assuming I was one of a panel of usual suspects being asked to comment on this rather common sentiment, I gave my usual response.
Now it seems that I was being set up by a hired publicity machine, so that I would appear to be mounting a personal attack upon a particular individual who is my rival for a literary prize. And I also learn that the quotation they selected is an unrepresentative one from a book I haven&#039;t read (I look forward to doing so), which is competing with my own for the same prize. I hope you will allow me publicly to apologise to Peter Kay and wish him well in the competition.
Richard Dawkins
Oxford</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two sides to every story&#8230;..</p>
<p>Letters<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Dawkins: an apology to Peter Kay</p>
<p>Saturday March 10, 2007</p>
<p>Guardian</p>
<p>I am distressed to find myself reported as participating in a &#8220;literary spat&#8221;, and as &#8220;pouring scorn&#8221; on an individual, comedian Peter Kay, for whom I actually feel nothing but goodwill (Heard the one about the atheist who scorned a comedian for his belief in a comforting God? March 8). The explanation is as follows. I am one of those whom reporters regularly telephone for a soundbite. Last week, I was fed a quotation from somebody, previously unknown to me, who said he believed in God because he found it comforting. Assuming I was one of a panel of usual suspects being asked to comment on this rather common sentiment, I gave my usual response.<br />
Now it seems that I was being set up by a hired publicity machine, so that I would appear to be mounting a personal attack upon a particular individual who is my rival for a literary prize. And I also learn that the quotation they selected is an unrepresentative one from a book I haven&#8217;t read (I look forward to doing so), which is competing with my own for the same prize. I hope you will allow me publicly to apologise to Peter Kay and wish him well in the competition.<br />
Richard Dawkins<br />
Oxford</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King Cogidubnus</title>
		<link>http://www.cynicalbastard.com/index.php/2007/03/the-height-of-hubris/comment-page-1/#comment-6569</link>
		<dc:creator>King Cogidubnus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 09:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicalbastard.com/index.php/2007/03/the-height-of-hubris/#comment-6569</guid>
		<description>Calm down dear, it&#039;s only an atheist!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calm down dear, it&#8217;s only an atheist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
