Has fundamentalist athiest Richard Dawkins finally taken one step too far? Suggesting the not-exactly-pretty woman at the centre of the BA cross scandal had ‘one of the stupidest faces I’d ever seen’ is one thing. It’s all in a day’s work for the arch-rationalist bully covering his ears and shouting ‘la la la I can’t hear you.’.
But taking on Peter Kay, one of Britain’s most-loved comedians? Not very bright at all really. Certainly, it won’t be wise to come up to Greater Manchester any time soon.
And what’s the nature of his complaint? That people who happen to believe in God find comfort in it. Well, shucks, maybe that’s the point? And maybe the search for that comfort is rather central to the human experience—it hasn’t done badly for our culture in terms of art, music and all that stuff that makes life worth living after all. We can’t all find our sense of purpose in a blinding lack of self-awareness, a surfeit of smugness and total intolerance, as does Dawkins.
Funny, though, that he suggests his problem with religion is about ‘truth’. Never mind the rather deep philosophical nature of the search for truth, Dawkins’ connection to fact is somewhat lacking throughout ‘The God Delusion’. The permanent scar in my wall from the book being bounced against it was caused by the book’s lack of understanding of history, philosophy, ethics, or, well, anything very much.
And, patently, what ordinary people tend to think and feel. Course, they’re all ’stupid’ as far as the dear Prof. is concerned. And why should stupid people be allowed to publish books? It might affect Dawkins’ own future plans, of course.
Calm down dear, it’s only an atheist!
Comment by King Cogidubnus — March 12, 2007 @ 9:38 am
Two sides to every story…..
Letters
——————————————————————————–
Dawkins: an apology to Peter Kay
Saturday March 10, 2007
Guardian
I am distressed to find myself reported as participating in a “literary spat”, and as “pouring scorn” on an individual, comedian Peter Kay, for whom I actually feel nothing but goodwill (Heard the one about the atheist who scorned a comedian for his belief in a comforting God? March 8). The explanation is as follows. I am one of those whom reporters regularly telephone for a soundbite. Last week, I was fed a quotation from somebody, previously unknown to me, who said he believed in God because he found it comforting. Assuming I was one of a panel of usual suspects being asked to comment on this rather common sentiment, I gave my usual response.
Now it seems that I was being set up by a hired publicity machine, so that I would appear to be mounting a personal attack upon a particular individual who is my rival for a literary prize. And I also learn that the quotation they selected is an unrepresentative one from a book I haven’t read (I look forward to doing so), which is competing with my own for the same prize. I hope you will allow me publicly to apologise to Peter Kay and wish him well in the competition.
Richard Dawkins
Oxford
Comment by King Cogidubnus — March 16, 2007 @ 9:14 am
Seeing only two sides to every story is needlessly simplistic surely?
Comment by Bertie — March 16, 2007 @ 11:09 am